Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is newer than AMD Ryzen 9 7900, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1696 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | |
2: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | |
×Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | ×AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$346.83 - BUY
![]() |
$388.74 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | AM5 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.3 GHz | Up to 5.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 20) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 36.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel AI Boost | AMD Radeon Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2023 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 1683 | |
CPU Value | 143.8 | 124.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4562(0.0%) | 4141(-9.2%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 49868(0.0%) | 48542(-2.7%) |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | 49,868 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48,542 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | 143.8 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 124.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | 4,562 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 4,141 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $11.86 |