Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz is newer than AMD Athlon II X2 260u also around 24% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon II X2 260u uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 56 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon II X2 260u | |
×Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD Athlon II X2 260u | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$14.99 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | AM3 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 65W | 25W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $4.56 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2011 | Q4 2010 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 43 | |
CPU Value | 62.4 | 8.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 11543(0.0%) | 7163(-37.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 935(0.0%) | 713(-23.8%) |
Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | 935 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 260u | 713 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | 62.4 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 260u | 8.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | 1,154 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 260u | 716 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron E3500 @ 2.70GHz | AMD Athlon II X2 260u | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 25W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.05 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.013 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 18.3 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $4.56 |