iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

vendor Kirin9000E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7325

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×vendor Kirin9000E×Qualcomm Snapdragon 7325+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
Other
First Seen on ChartQ4 2021Q3 2021
# of Samples2211
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)2653(0.0%)2006(-24.4%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)6235(0.0%)5424(-13.0%)
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 24th of September 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
vendor Kirin9000E
6,235
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7325
5,424
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 24th of September 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
vendor Kirin9000E
2,653
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7325
2,006

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
vendor Kirin9000EQualcomm Snapdragon 7325
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.