Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked
Price and performance details for the Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Is the Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz Good for Gaming?
This is an old CPU that contains 4 Cores and 4 Threads. This CPU may not do well with games especially more recent releases. Best to check with your system requirements from the developer of the games you are interested to see if it is compatible. [More ...]
Description:
Class: Desktop
Socket:
Clockspeed: 1.8 GHz
Turbo Speed: 2.5 GHz
Cores: 4 Threads: 4
Cache Size: L1: 1792 KB, L2: 16.0 MB, L3: 0 MB
Other names: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4115 CPU @ 1.80GHz, Intel Celeron J4115 CPU @ 1.80GHz
CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2020
CPUmark/$Price: NA
Overall Rank: 2259
Last Price Change: NA
Integer Math | 10,694 MOps/Sec |
---|---|
Floating Point Math | 5,767 MOps/Sec |
Find Prime Numbers | 7 Million Primes/Sec |
Random String Sorting | 4,846 Thousand Strings/Sec |
Data Encryption | 1,584 MBytes/Sec |
Data Compression | 38,525 KBytes/Sec |
Physics | 190 Frames/Sec |
Extended Instructions | 1,112 Million Matrices/Sec |
Single Thread | 1,068 MOps/Sec |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-13900K | 59,730 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | 41,459 | |
Intel Core i7-12700K | 34,743 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 22,628 | |
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | 22,061 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 21,934 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 18,420 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 17,785 | |
Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | 15,471 | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 14,250 | |
Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz | 2,687 |
Processor | CPU Mark / $Price | |
---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 213.01 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 153.96 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 140.23 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | 117.45 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | 104.79 | |
Intel Core i7-12700K | 84.95 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 32.60 | |
Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz | NA | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | NA | |
Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | NA | |
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | NA |
Processor | Average Thread Rating | |
---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-13900K | 4,665 | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | 4,194 | |
Intel Core i7-12700K | 4,053 | |
Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | 3,956 | |
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | 3,843 | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 3,715 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 3,359 | |
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 2,942 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | 2,663 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 2,569 | |
Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz | 1,068 |
Baseline | CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
BL1890920 - Aug 26 2023 | 3012 | |
BL1889507 - Aug 24 2023 | 2975 | |
BL1881622 - Aug 12 2023 | 2888 | |
BL1806276 - Apr 29 2023 | 1825 | |
BL1795620 - Apr 15 2023 | 1519 |
Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz | 2,687 | |
AMD A8-7600 APU vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 3,223 (+20.0%) | |
AMD A8-6600K APU vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 3,002 (+11.7%) | |
AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,977 (+10.8%) | |
Intel Celeron J4125 @ 2.00GHz vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,972 (+10.6%) | |
AMD A10-5800K APU vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,970 (+10.5%) | |
AMD A8-5600K APU vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,814 (+4.7%) | |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,601 (-3.2%) | |
AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,588 (-3.7%) | |
AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,485 (-7.5%) | |
AMD Phenom II X4 945 vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,365 (-12.0%) | |
AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 2,223 (-17.3%) | |
Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz vs Intel Celeron J4115 | 3,319 (+23.5%) |
Processor | Relative Gaming Score | |
---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 9,182 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 9,101 | |
Intel Core i9-14900KF | 8,974 | |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | 8,540 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 8,436 | |
Intel Core i9-13900K | 7,816 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D | 7,812 | |
Intel Core i9-13900KF | 7,533 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | 7,238 | |
Intel Core i9-13900 | 6,917 | |
Intel Core i9-13900F | 6,898 | |
Intel Core i7-13700K | 6,856 | |
Intel Celeron J4115 @ 1.80GHz | 169 |