iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

MT8766B

Price and performance details for the MT8766B can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

MT8766B

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.0 GHz

Cores: 4 Threads: 4

Other names: MT8766B

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 3309

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
774

Single Thread Rating: 502
Samples: 18*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for MT8766B

Integer Math7,431 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math1,428 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers2 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting3 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption523.4 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression15.1 MBytes/Sec
Physics57 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions573 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread502 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 31st of March 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for MT8766B

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 27th of March 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 27th of March 2023.

Search for MT8766B
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,199
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,656
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,518
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,683
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,410
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,354
Apple A11 Bionic
 4,355
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 4,076
AMD 3015Ce
 2,067
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 1,554
MT8766B
 774
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 44.19
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 13.63
MT8766B
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Apple A11 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,724
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,402
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,309
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,225
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,937
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,769
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 1,517
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Apple A11 Bionic
 1,281
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 820
MT8766B
 502
Last 5 Baselines for MT8766B
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8055602 - Jan 18 2023
747
BL8055472 - Jan 15 2023
1059
BL8055308 - Jan 12 2023
735
BL8051935 - Nov 07 2022
696
BL8051931 - Nov 07 2022
827
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for MT8766B
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
MT8766B
 774
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM429 vs MT8766B
 947 (+22.2%)
MediaTek MT6761V/WBB vs MT8766B
 716 (-7.5%)
MediaTek MT8166B vs MT8766B
 947 (+22.3%)
MT8165 vs MT8766B
 916 (+18.3%)
MediaTek MT6761V/WE vs MT8766B
 701 (-9.5%)
Qualcomm MSM8974 vs MT8766B
 683 (-11.8%)
Samsung EXYNOS5420 vs MT8766B
 648 (-16.4%)
MediaTek MT8168A vs MT8766B
 642 (-17.1%)
MediaTek MT6737T vs MT8766B
 640 (-17.4%)
Qualcomm MSM8974PRO-AB vs MT8766B
 636 (-17.9%)
Qualcomm MSM8917 vs MT8766B
 636 (-17.9%)
Qualcomm MSM8974PRO-AC vs MT8766B
 609 (-21.4%)