iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

MT8788

Price and performance details for the MT8788 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
MT8788

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.0 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: MT8788

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 2296

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
2726

Single Thread Rating: 902
Samples: 10*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for MT8788

Integer Math22,324 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math5,305 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers6 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting7,725 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption2,168 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression51,782 KBytes/Sec
Physics151 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions811 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread902 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 3rd of December 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for MT8788

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 29th of November 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 29th of November 2023.

Search for MT8788
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 4th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
26,119
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,199
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,569
Apple A15 Bionic
9,883
Apple A14 Bionic
8,537
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,735
Intel N100
5,620
Apple A13 Bionic
5,603
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,382
MT8788
2,726
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 4th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.91
Intel N100
43.91
MT8788
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 4th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,708
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,700
Apple A15 Bionic
3,616
Apple A14 Bionic
3,399
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,278
Apple A13 Bionic
2,297
Intel N100
1,970
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,924
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,768
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
MT8788
902
Last 5 Baselines for MT8788
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8063634 - Jun 08 2023
3061
BL8060743 - Apr 18 2023
1425
BL8059466 - Mar 27 2023
2828
BL8057496 - Feb 21 2023
3192
BL8056997 - Feb 13 2023
3120
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for MT8788
As of 4th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
MT8788
2,726
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 vs MT8788
3,327 (+22.1%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON vs MT8788
3,363 (+23.4%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7125 vs MT8788
3,347 (+22.8%)
MediaTek MT6785V/CC vs MT8788
3,343 (+22.7%)
MT6853V/NZA vs MT8788
3,321 (+21.8%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO vs MT8788
3,314 (+21.6%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM720G vs MT8788
3,285 (+20.5%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7150 vs MT8788
3,258 (+19.5%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDMMAGPIE vs MT8788
3,155 (+15.8%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MT8788
3,111 (+14.1%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 vs MT8788
2,901 (+6.5%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc MSM8998 vs MT8788
2,788 (+2.3%)