iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

QTI SM6450

Price and performance details for the QTI SM6450 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

QTI SM6450

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.2 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: QTI SM6450

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1546

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
5474

Single Thread Rating: 1973
Samples: 8*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for QTI SM6450

Integer Math26,871 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math12,655 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers11 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15,715 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,322 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression99,153 KBytes/Sec
Physics236 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,403 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,973 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 7th of December 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for QTI SM6450

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 6th of December 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 6th of December 2023.

Search for QTI SM6450
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 26,041
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,198
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,577
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,883
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,538
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,735
Intel N100
 5,629
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,607
QTI SM6450
 5,474
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,382
AMD 3015Ce
 2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel N100
 43.97
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.94
QTI SM6450
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,708
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,660
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,616
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,400
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,280
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,299
QTI SM6450
 1,973
Intel N100
 1,970
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,924
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,768
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Last 5 Baselines for QTI SM6450
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8074316 - Dec 05 2023
6228
BL8073557 - Nov 22 2023
5923
BL8072443 - Nov 04 2023
5996
BL8071099 - Oct 14 2023
5618
BL8070393 - Oct 05 2023
1708
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for QTI SM6450
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
QTI SM6450
 5,474
Google Tensor vs QTI SM6450
 6,788 (+24.0%)
QTI SM8350 vs QTI SM6450
 6,491 (+18.6%)
QTI SM8250 vs QTI SM6450
 6,488 (+18.5%)
QTI SM8450 vs QTI SM6450
 6,308 (+15.2%)
QTI SM7325 vs QTI SM6450
 5,882 (+7.5%)
Mediatek MT6877V/TTZA vs QTI SM6450
 4,827 (-11.8%)
QTI SM6375 vs QTI SM6450
 4,181 (-23.6%)
Qualcomm SM8350 vs QTI SM6450
 6,762 (+23.5%)
Qualcomm SM8250 vs QTI SM6450
 6,675 (+21.9%)
Mediatek MT6893Z_T/CZA vs QTI SM6450
 6,599 (+20.6%)
Samsung s5e9925 vs QTI SM6450
 6,480 (+18.4%)
Mediatek MT6895Z/TCZA vs QTI SM6450
 6,359 (+16.2%)