iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung Exynos 9610

Price and performance details for the Samsung Exynos 9610 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
Samsung Exynos 9610

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.3 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung Exynos 9610

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 2497

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
2240

Single Thread Rating: 955
Samples: 305*
*Margin for error: Low

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung Exynos 9610

Integer Math16,699 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math3,916 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers7 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting6,968 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption1,664 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression38,750 KBytes/Sec
Physics166 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions690 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread955 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 28th of September 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung Exynos 9610

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 25th of September 2023
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 25th of September 2023.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for Samsung Exynos 9610
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 28th of September 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
26,279
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,251
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,640
Apple A15 Bionic
9,868
Apple A14 Bionic
8,526
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,741
Apple A13 Bionic
5,574
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,393
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
4,063
Samsung Exynos 9610
2,240
AMD 3015Ce
2,082
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 28th of September 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
44.14
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
13.59
Samsung Exynos 9610
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 28th of September 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,761
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,715
Apple A15 Bionic
3,622
Apple A14 Bionic
3,399
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,290
Apple A13 Bionic
2,289
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,932
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,769
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
1,517
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Samsung Exynos 9610
955
Last 5 Baselines for Samsung Exynos 9610
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8067245 - Aug 14 2023
2913
BL8065930 - Jul 23 2023
2238
BL8065793 - Jul 20 2023
2079
BL8065660 - Jul 18 2023
2911
BL8064619 - Jun 26 2023
2681
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung Exynos 9610
As of 28th of September 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung Exynos 9610
2,240
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc MSM8998 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,776 (+23.9%)
MT6769V/CZ vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,733 (+22.0%)
Hisilicon Kirin970 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,675 (+19.4%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM710 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,626 (+17.3%)
MediaTek MT6771V/C vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,611 (+16.6%)
Unisoc T618 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,538 (+13.3%)
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,537 (+13.3%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM670 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,517 (+12.4%)
MediaTek MT6769T vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,495 (+11.4%)
MT6769V/CT vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,474 (+10.5%)
MediaTek MT6769Z vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,440 (+8.9%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc BENGAL vs Samsung Exynos 9610
2,427 (+8.4%)