iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung s5e9925

Price and performance details for the Samsung s5e9925 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

Samsung s5e9925

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.8 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung s5e9925

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1351

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
6480

Single Thread Rating: 2184
Samples: 64*
*Margin for error: Low

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung s5e9925

Integer Math25,652 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math13,895 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers26 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15,653 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,257 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression93,506 KBytes/Sec
Physics361 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,492 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread2,184 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 7th of December 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung s5e9925

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 4th of December 2023
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 4th of December 2023.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for Samsung s5e9925
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 26,041
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,198
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,577
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,883
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,538
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,735
Samsung s5e9925
 6,480
Intel N100
 5,629
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,607
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,382
AMD 3015Ce
 2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel N100
 43.97
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.94
Samsung s5e9925
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,708
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,660
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,616
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,400
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,280
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,299
Samsung s5e9925
 2,184
Intel N100
 1,970
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,924
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,768
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Last 5 Baselines for Samsung s5e9925
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8074294 - Dec 04 2023
6256
BL8074293 - Dec 04 2023
6256
BL8074233 - Dec 04 2023
6858
BL8074223 - Dec 04 2023
6673
BL8074119 - Dec 02 2023
7189
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung s5e9925
As of 7th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung s5e9925
 6,480
Google GS201 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,385 (+14.0%)
QTI SM8475 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,285 (+12.4%)
Google Tensor vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,788 (+4.8%)
QTI SM8350 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,491 (+0.2%)
QTI SM8250 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,488 (+0.1%)
QTI SM8450 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,308 (-2.7%)
QTI SM7325 vs Samsung s5e9925
 5,882 (-9.2%)
Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,904 (+22.0%)
QTI SM7475 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,653 (+18.1%)
Mediatek MT6895Z_A/TCZA vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,615 (+17.5%)
Mediatek MT6895Z_B/TCZA vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,273 (+12.2%)
Qualcomm SM8350 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,762 (+4.4%)