iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung s5e9925

Price and performance details for the Samsung s5e9925 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

Samsung s5e9925

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.8 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung s5e9925

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1432

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
6595

Single Thread Rating: 2176
Samples: 103*
*Margin for error: Low

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung s5e9925

Integer Math26,135 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math14,031 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers26 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15,810 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,299 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression94,497 KBytes/Sec
Physics368 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,548 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread2,176 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 18th of April 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung s5e9925

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 16th of April 2024
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 16th of April 2024.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for Samsung s5e9925
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 18th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 25,508
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,183
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,495
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,900
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,542
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,713
Samsung s5e9925
 6,595
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,674
Intel N100
 5,555
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,363
AMD 3015Ce
 2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 18th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.67
Intel N100
 43.40
Samsung s5e9925
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 18th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,704
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,635
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,610
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,395
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,235
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,317
Samsung s5e9925
 2,176
Intel N100
 1,961
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,929
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,767
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Last 5 Baselines for Samsung s5e9925
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8081242 - Apr 11 2024
7331
BL8081043 - Apr 07 2024
1698
BL8080919 - Apr 05 2024
7050
BL8080531 - Mar 28 2024
6505
BL8080348 - Mar 24 2024
6766
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung s5e9925
As of 18th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung s5e9925
 6,595
Google GS201 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,370 (+11.8%)
QTI SM8475 vs Samsung s5e9925
 7,341 (+11.3%)
Google Tensor vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,720 (+1.9%)
QTI SM8250 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,576 (-0.3%)
QTI SM8350 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,551 (-0.7%)
QTI SM8450 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,406 (-2.9%)
Mediatek MT6893 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,326 (-4.1%)
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,198 (-6.0%)
Samsung s5e8835 vs Samsung s5e9925
 6,036 (-8.5%)
QTI SM7325 vs Samsung s5e9925
 5,928 (-10.1%)
QTI SM8150 vs Samsung s5e9925
 5,316 (-19.4%)
Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung s5e9925
 8,122 (+23.2%)