iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

vendor Kirin9000E

Price and performance details for the vendor Kirin9000E can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

vendor Kirin9000E

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 3.1 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: vendor Kirin9000E

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q4 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1204

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
6235

Single Thread Rating: 2653
Samples: 2*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for vendor Kirin9000E

Integer Math33,656 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math15,154 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers24 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting14 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,014 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression106.6 MBytes/Sec
Physics483 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,307 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread2,653 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 25th of March 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for vendor Kirin9000E

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 19th of March 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 19th of March 2023.

Search for vendor Kirin9000E
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 25th of March 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,202
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,658
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,517
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,683
vendor Kirin9000E
 6,235
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,425
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,354
Apple A11 Bionic
 4,355
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 4,077
AMD 3015Ce
 2,067
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 1,554
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 25th of March 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 44.20
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 13.63
vendor Kirin9000E
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Apple A11 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 25th of March 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,724
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,401
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,306
vendor Kirin9000E
 2,653
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,224
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,937
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,769
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 1,516
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Apple A11 Bionic
 1,281
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 820
Last 2 Baselines for vendor Kirin9000E
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8042624 - Jun 17 2022
7742
BL8023807 - Nov 06 2021
4728
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for vendor Kirin9000E
As of 25th of March 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
vendor Kirin9000E
 6,235
SM8350 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,120 (-1.8%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA vs vendor Kirin9000E
 5,624 (-9.8%)
vendor Kirin980 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 5,386 (-13.6%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350AC vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,588 (+5.7%)
Odin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,456 (+3.5%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_AC vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,408 (+2.8%)
SM7325 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,178 (-0.9%)
MT6893Z_A/CZA vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,043 (-3.1%)
MT6891Z/CZA vs vendor Kirin9000E
 6,025 (-3.4%)
vendor Kirin990 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 5,873 (-5.8%)
MT6891 vs vendor Kirin9000E
 5,791 (-7.1%)
MT6893Z_D/CZA vs vendor Kirin9000E
 5,701 (-8.6%)